On Wednesday, the Biden administration announced it had been proposing new regulations for student loans of the Department of Education. The proposed rules call for an $85 billion expansion of existing federal education loan forgiveness programs. They'd expand eligibility for programs created under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama and end the capitalization of interest on federal student education loans in certain circumstances.
President Joe Biden's new rules would broaden eligibility for education loan debt relief for borrowers who have been defrauded by their institutions, borrowers whose institutions closed, permanently disabled borrowers, and borrowers who take \”public service\” jobs after graduation.
The administration also intends to ban interest capitalization in some circumstances. Capitalizing interest allows the Education Department to include unpaid interest on student education loans to the borrower's loan balance. This increases the size of your debt and future interest payments.
The Obama administration's \”borrower defense\” program is really a loan forgiveness procedure that addresses the government student loan debt of people that were allegedly defrauded by their schools. The current policy could be amended to produce a \”broader and clearer standard for what kinds of misconduct could lead to borrower defense discharges,\” reads a well known fact sheet from the Department of Education. The Biden administration's rules would create two new categories of school misconduct that would qualify a student borrower for debt forgiveness: \”substantial omissions of fact\” by the institution and \”aggressive and deceptive recruitment.\”
The new borrower defense policy language also includes \”a presumption that borrowers reasonably relied upon misrepresentations or omissions,\” and broadens the appeal process for student borrowers whose forgiveness requests are denied. Additionally, it states that loan forgiveness will not be contingent on the Department of Education recouping education loan disbursements from institutions that defraud students.
The proposed regulations would also discharge debt held by students whose institutions closed when they were enrolled. Based on the Department of Education, the brand new rules \”provide automatic discharges to the borrower who had been enrolled within 180 days before the closure and who didn't complete their education in the school or with an approved teach-out agreement at another school within one year following the closure of their original school.\”
Under the Biden administration's plan, a larger quantity of borrowers would also receive loan cancellation under the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) discharge. Borrowers who've total and permanent disabilities would no longer be subject to a three-year income-monitoring period, which allows the Department of Education to reinstate loans for borrowers who return to work. The new rules would also \”widen the types of documentation and signatures borrowers may undergo demonstrate they are eligible for relief\” and allow more kinds of disability to be susceptible to TPD discharges.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program is the fourth program receiving substantial changes. Signed into law by Bush in 2007, it enables borrowers who make 120 monthly payments while directly employed full time with a government agency or 501(c)3 nonprofit to have their remaining federal loan balance forgiven. The new rules would require the Department of Education to count payments which were late or larger than the minimum payment and issue a \”time-limited waiver to ensure that student borrowers can count payments all federal home loan programs or repayment plans toward forgiveness,\” including \”loan types and payment plans that were not previously eligible.\”
These proposed changes come in the wake of growing demands by progressive activists and members of Congress to forgive federal student loan debt. In May, White House officials seemed poised to announce up to $10,000 in debt forgiveness per borrower for millions of Americans. The proposals announced on Wednesday simply expand existing forgiveness programs.
At first glance, many of these loan forgiveness programs might seem to have merit. But they are all trying to paper over issues that the federal government created and that will persist following the new rules get into effect. Forgiving billions of dollars in student loans means billions of federal dollars went to poorly run schools and students who were, oftentimes, unprepared for college. While those students may deserve some kind of debt relief-and which very few of these can receive through bankruptcy-the Education Department continues to issue loans to unprepared students in order to attend poorly run schools.
The expansion of benefits offered by the PSLF program spells unique problems for taxpayers and future borrowers alike. Expanding eligibility to more types of \”public service\” workers, including employees of non-public companies and contractors, is expected to cost over $13 billion within the next Ten years.
As with debt forgiveness for borrowers who are misled by their schools, PSLF on its face sounds like advisable. If a student decides to consider a career in public service-an essential but presumably low-paying job-then, after Ten years of payments, that student will be rewarded for his service having a set amount of his remaining loan balance paid. However, those invoved with the public sector often have the very best employment, health care, and pensions among America's middle-class workers.
What's more, many professions counted as \”public service\” are the highest-paying positions in the entire employment market. Physicians employed by nonprofit hospitals, for instance, are eligible for PSLF. However, whether a cardiologist is employed by a nonprofit or perhaps a for-profit hospital, his yearly salary will likely top $400,000. Thus, prospective physicians can take on hundreds of thousands of dollars indebted for medical school, and just pay a small fraction of the amount borrowed, while accruing millions of dollars in income over the course of their careers.
When academic deans can assure students that a large debt burden can be discharged by working for a nonprofit or even the government after graduation, they are able to more easily justify exorbitant tuition costs. In the end, why worry about borrowing a massive sum should you do not possess to repay it? The PSLF means to fix high debt burdens for public sector workers only has aggravated the problem and can still. When the government pours funding by means of debt settlement in to the market for specific degrees, schools wind up using these funds to warrant hiking prices, thus generating a bigger student debt crisis. In turn, this enlarged crisis cries out for more government funding.
The solution to runaway student debt inflation is for the government to prevent subsidizing tuition hikes. While limited debt relief for defrauded or disabled borrowers makes sense, the federal government must start making policy proposals that will attack the student debt crisis at its source-the cost of college attendance.
Student loan debt is a genuine and pressing problem for America's poorest borrowers, but it's merely a hassle for millions of others, including many beneficiaries of PSLF. Solving the college cost problem in the long term requires getting the government from the lending business.
2 comments